Sunday 14 March 2021

Ramana Gita rewritten section 2 nadimanthan

 This has been the subject of doubt with several bhaktas. Will Maharshi please enlighten us on this matter?

Maharshi: Granthi is a knot. The knot of the heart ties two things together: the Supreme Brahman or Atma, and the appearance also of the jiva connected with a body. The location or contact between the body and Brahman is styled as the granthi or knot. It is by reason of that relation (or knot) that one gets the idea of a body, and the idea that he has or is a body. The body itself is inert, but Brahman is of the nature of Consciousness. The relation between these two is inferred by the intellect.

When the body is active in the waking and dreaming states, it is so by reason of its being overshadowed or covered by the image or reflection of the pure Chaitanya, i.e., Brahman. When, however, one is asleep, or for other reasons inactive and unconscious (e.g., in faint or coma), such image or reflection is absent, and from this fact the place of the Chaitanya or Brahman in the body is ascertained or located. It is located in the heart ( hrdayam, hrdayam), into which the soul or ego retreats in deep sleep, ceasing its conscious activity in all parts of the body. This heart is connected with a number of nadis (nerves) and the reflection of the Chaitanya on the heart spreads from the heart through these nadis or nerves into all parts of the body. The Chaitanya is subtle like electricity; and just as electricity, which in its manifest form is seen in lights, operates through solid material-like electric wires, so this Chaitanya Jyoti, or light of Brahman, moves from its subtle form through these nadis or nerves into the entire human frame. The sun, from its place in the heavens, illumines the entire solar system; so does Chaitanya Jyoti, or the light of Brahman, taking its place in the heart, illumine the entire human frame; and when such Chaitanya pervades every part of this body, then does the embodied soul, the jiva, derive all its experiences.

There are various powers manifest in the different nadis or nerves according to the function performed by each tissue or organ into which they (the nerves) enter. All such powers, however, are the various transformations of the one Chaitanya that permeates the nadis. But there is one nadi called the sushumna which is specifically the nadi prominently connected with the manifestation of the Chaitanya itself. It is also termed Atma-nadi or Amritanadi. 

   ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Imp part :


When man is operating through the other nadis alone, he derives the impression that the body is himself, and that the external world is different from him, and hence he is filled with abhimanam or dehabhimanam, i.e., 'I-am-the-body idea'. 


Renouncing 'I am the body' idea and sinking into the Self = Nadi-Manthan

When, however, he renounces these ideas (i.e., that the body is himself and that the world is different from himself) and expels the abhimanam (I-am-the-body idea) and enters on the enquiry into the Self, Atma Vichara, with concentration, then he is said to be "churning the nerves" (nadimathanam). 


Due to Nadimnathan, loni of Atma seperated fom nadis


By such churning, the butter of the Atma or Self is separated from the nadis in all parts of the body and the Self shines in the Amrita or Atma-nadi.

 Then is the Self or Brahman realised. 

Then one perceives nothing but the Atman (Brahman) everywhere.


Such a person may have sense objects presented to him and yet, even when receiving those impressions, he will receive them as himself, not as different from himself, which is the view of the ignorant. 

In everything that he sees, the ignorant one perceives form. 

The wise one perceives Brahman inside and outside of everything that he sees. 

Such a person is said to be a Bhinna-granthi, i.e., the Knotless

For him the knot which tied up matter or body with Brahman has been severed. 

The term granthi or knot is applied both to the nadi-bandha, or physical knot in the nerves (something like the ganglia), and the abhimana or attachment to the body resulting therefrom.

 The subtle jiva operates through these knots of nadis when he perceives gross-matter. 

When the jiva retreats from all these nadis and rests in the one nadi, i.e. Atma-nadi, he is termed the Bhinna-granthi, or the Knotless; and his illumination results in his achieving Self-realization.


Let us take the case of a red-hot piece of iron. Here, what was formerly the cold, black iron is now seen suffused with and in the form of fire.

 Similarly, the one dull, cold and dark jiva, or even his body, when overpowered by the fire of Atma Vichara (knowledge of the Self), is perceived to be in the form of the Atman.


 When a man reaches that stage, all the vasanas (tendencies), derived (it may be) from many previous lives and connected with the body, disappear. 


The Atma, realising that it is not the body, realises also the idea that it is not the agent performing karma or action and that, consequently, the vasanas or fruits resulting from such (antecedent) karma do not attach to it (the Atman).

.As there is no other substance besides the Atman, no doubts can trouble that Atman.

 The Atman that has once burst its knots asunder can never again be bound. 

That state is termed by some Parama Sakti (highest sakti) and by others Parama Santi (supreme peace).


..............................................

Chapter XII

Kapali Sastri's questions:

K: Both the ignorant man and the man of Realization in their actual daily life perceive the experiencer, experience, and the objects experienced. How is the Realised one better off than the ignorant person?

Maharshi: Because the Self-realised sees the unity of the Real amidst the multiplicity of appearances, whereas the ignorant man only sees and succumbs to the appearance of plurality. The former sees himself, i.e., the experiencer, the objects experienced, and experience as one and the same Self, and the latter does not. To the latter, who does not see the Self, everything is different.


K: In the Real (in which these differences appear) is there energy (Sakti)?

Maharshi: Yes! The Real includes all energy (Sakti).

K: But is that energy, within the Real, active?

Maharshi: Yes. It is active in producing these worlds. The active energy needs and has a support (asraya). That support is inactive and changeless though energy is active and changing. This activity and change is termed the "indescribable illusion" (maya). Illusion is manifold. The apparent change, motion, or activity in the universe is itself an illusion. The Real cannot and does not change. The distinction between the Self and energy is an illusion. If the sense-bound person changes his angle of vision, that distinction disappears, and the One alone remains.

K: Is the energy (of the Real, the Supreme) that produces all these worlds changing and transitory or changeless and eternal?

Maharshi: The Supreme that changes by reason of His energy is yet changeless. This profound mystery, sages alone can unravel. Change is activity (vyapara) and activity is termed energy (Sakti). The Supreme created these worlds by His energy (Sakti). Activity being twofold — evolving (pravritti) and withdrawing (nivritti) — the Supreme also withdraws these worlds by His energy (Sakti), as the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, IV.5.15 states:

yatra tvasya sarvam-aatmaivaabhuut tatkena kam pashyet

yatra tvasya sarvam-aatmaivaabhuut tatkena kam pashyet

Where, for one, everything has become Atma alone, what is there to be seen, and by whom?

In this passage relating to the activity of the Supreme in withdrawing (nivritti) the universe, first the term "everything" (sarva) is used. That refers to the multiplicity of appearances which prevailed at the time when duality was experienced. The other term "became" (abhut) refers to some activity. The term "Atma alone" (Atmaiva) expresses the fact that all differentiating activity is finally withdrawn into the Supreme Self (Atma) only. Thus we have the high authority of the Vedas to show that one Atma alone exists forever and is Real and that all else is illusory and evanescent.


K: Can we know the Real (Swarupa) without its activity?

Maharshi: No, we do not know the unmanifest Real apart from its manifesting activity.

 Energy (Sakti), according to Saktas, has two names, the activity (vyapara) and support (asraya). Activity is creation, maintenance, re-absorption (pralaya), etc. The support is nothing but the Real, the Supreme (Swarupa). The Real is all, underlies all and needs the support of none. Such is the truth about the Real, its energy and activity. Multiform existence is the result of activity, and activity presupposes energy with the Supreme. When the Supreme is unclothed with energy, no activity arises, nor the Universe. In the endless whirl of creation and reabsorption, when reabsorption occurs, activity merges in the Supreme.

All human experience is impossible in the absence of energy (Sakti); no creation, no knowledge, and no triad can exist then. In the language of Saktas, Sakti (energy) is the Supreme, the one Real, and takes the name of activity (vyapara) in the act of creation, etc., and the name of Self (Swarupa) by reason of its being the support or sine-qua-non of activity.

If one considers that change (chalana) is the distinguishing characteristic of energy, then it must be admitted that we posit the existence of the Supreme Substance as that on which the play of energy or change takes place. That Supreme Substance is differently styled by different sets of persons. Some call it Sakti and others Swarupa; some call it Brahman, and others Purusha.

Reality (Satya) is to be viewed in two ways: first by its description and next by its nature or constitution, i.e., as the thing in itself. By description and name, that is, through speech, one tries to approach it and get an idea of it. But the Reality, as it is in itself, can only be realised; it cannot be expressed. The description given of it in the Vedas is:

devanagari text which is transliterated below

yato vaa imaani bhuutaani jaayante
yena jaataani jiivanti
yat-prayantyabhisam-vishanti
tad-vijijnaasasva tad brahmeti

To him, verily, he said: Whence indeed these beings are born; whereby, when born, they live;
wherein, when departing, they enter; That seek thou to know; That is Brahman.

That Source, the maintenance, and end of all refers to its external attribute — activity, in order to give the learner an idea of it. But the thing as it is in itself must only be immediately (directly) realised (aparokshaanubhuti, aparokshaanubhuuti).

The wise (i.e., Vedantins) say that the basis or sine-qua-non of energy (Sakti) is the Self (Swarupa), and that its activity is its attribute. By inquiring into the cause or root of that activity, one reaches its basis, the Self. 

Substance and attribute, that is, Self and its basis are inseparable. 

Let any one try to separate them, his mind retires baffled from the task. 

It is always by its attribute of activity that the Self is made known and (from this point of view) the attribute, activity, is therefore associated always with the Substance, the Self. But this activity is (in reality, from the point of view of the Self-realised) not distinct from the Eternal Self. The distinction between substance and attribute is the result of illusion. If the illusion disappears, the Self alone remains.

No comments:

Post a Comment