Sunday, 17 May 2020

Tapa sadhana of the swamis -part 3

265
In support of their contention, the cham- 
pions of renunciation pointed out that a mere statement 
of the fact that ’* I am Brahman ** is not tantamount 
to the realization of Brahman, that Brahman can be 
realized only through long and arduous discipline of 
both body and mmd, in peaceful solitude , that, in 
the case of people immersed day in and day out in 
the belief that “ I am the body ” it is by no means 
easy to dispel the perverse notion, by merely repeating 


occasionally, “ I am Brahman ” and that, therefore, 
the stage of sanyasa wherein there is complete 
renunciation of desire and total avoidance of excite- 
ment, is indispensable to all true seekers of Brahman. 
To the enlightened who abide in Bralmtan, sanyasa 
is a matter of course. The truth is, they have already 
become Brahman. 

Abidance in Brahman is the unbroken flow of 
mental moulds informed by Brahman. When the 
mind is engaged in a state of samadhi, how can the 
concept of body and other objects extraneous to the 
Atman arise in it ? Concept of the Atman and concept 
of the non-Atman cannot exist in the mind at the 
same moment. How can there be activities connected 
with the body, etc., in the absence of a strong attachment 
to such objects ? As the enlightened ones abiding in 
Jnana are beyond the reach of activities, sanyasa 
comes to them quite spontaneously. The advocates 
of sanyasa, therefore, argue that during the stage of 
preparatory practice, sanyasa in the form of the 
renunciation of action is indispensable ; in the stage of 
attainment it becomes natural ; that Karma and Jnana 
cannot therefore exist in the same person at the same 
time ; that the Karma of Janaka, Vidura, etc., was 
merely the reflection of it and that only worldlings 
obsessed with the idea of sense enjoyment oppose the 
idea of sanyasa. 
Practical-minded men have often asked in the past 
and still continue to ask. “ Of what use to this world 
full of action, sustained by action and propelled by 
action, are the swiyasins who have renounced the 
world and its activities to live immersed in samadlii 
and bhajan 1 To this question, the sanyasins’ answer 
is quite simple. Their very state of non-action is in 
itself a mighty blessing to the world. More than all 
the learned disquisitions of erudite scholars, more 
than all their profound treatises, the Nirvikalpa 
Samadlii of a sanyasin touches the heart of humanity 
and elevates it to a higher plane. Their desireless 
non-action does greater good to the world than the 
swiftest and the most frantic activities of the revolu- 
tionaries. What is more, sanyasa is mightier than 
armies and is boundless as the sea. 
292
However, only the sage who has 
reahzed God can distinguish his bhss as truly satvik 
and divine Only he can identify his concentration 
with the divine trance great yogis have claimed to have 
achieved Satvik joy is something that can be attained 

only through long and arduous discipline. At Gomu- 
kha one reaches it without effort. 
It is my thirst for 
the nectar of tranquillity that drives me to wrestle 
with the difficulties of travel in these inaccessible 
fastnesses and reach that spot every year. It is this 
tranquillity, this bliss that adepts seek in the bustle of 
cities through long processes of meditative practice 
and the consequent dwindhng of the innate tendencies 
of the mind Tranquilhty is the innate nature of all, 

I at IS a self-existent reality Therefore there need be 
no striving to produce it Where is the need for 
effort to bring into being what IS ? Though it is, m 
Ignorance, referred to as non-existent, though tranquil- 
hty IS own inborn nature, being wrapped up by agita- 
tion, It is not experienced Abolish this agitation and 
tranquillity reveals itself Effort, then, is needed not 
to generate tranquillity but to bamsh agitation The 
mass of light, the Sun’s disc, is concealed by clouds 
The clouds only need move away and immediately 
the solar disc which appeared to be non-existent, 
reveals itself Here there is no question of producing 
the solar disc and making it shine In the same way, 
with the cessation of agitation tranquilhty nses (hke 
the Sun) But what is the nature of this agitation 9 
It IS nothing but the transmigratory existence 
consisting of agency, relation and act or of name, 
form and act How 7 The real nature of tranquilhty 
IS experienced in dreamless slumber even by morons 
Later there is waking from that state, that is to say 
“ I, I ” asserts itself for the first time as agency Then 
desire and so forth begin to operate Next, the sense 
organs hke the eye, the ear, etc , awake and operate 
m regard to their objects Together with that, crop 
up attitudes, affirmative or negative, and concepts 
such as happiness, unhappiness, etc It is the conglo- 
meration of the egoistic sense and so forth and their 
activities, thus engendered, that is known widely as 
distraction and that is agitation This transmigratory 
existence is nothing but the summation of these discrete 
masses and their operations The physical orgamsm, 
transmigratory existence, name, form, distraction, 
pain, agitation — these are but the synonyms denoting 
one and the same thmg Even so, tranquilhty, truth, 
beauty, bliss, self, God, Brahman — these are but 
different names of one and the same Thmg The 
source of this agitation or intranqmlhty is well-known 
to be the inner organ which assumes such form as 
V‘ I ”, “ this ”, “knower”, “known" In brief, agita- 


tion is the various fabrications of the inner organ 


and tranquilhty is their cessation 
Let there be a duahty, once the fabrications of the 
mind have been suppressed or let there not be, what 


IS certain is, that is the peerless state of tranquillity 
Let a tigress roar terribly in front of a sage merged 
m profound meditation or let a hourt sing sweetly 
before him , his state of tranqmlhty is unaffected 
by them all, because the mmd that grasps does not 
operate in regard to its objects, but remains concen- 
trated and so tranquil Therefore, though there are 
llexternal objects they are as good as non-existent and 
llthus no longer promote agitation Again, that is 
the reason why certam teachers have laid it down as 
a rule that by liquidating not the world created by 
God, but the world created by man, that is, by under- 
mining the fabncations of the mmd of man, certain 
tranquillity is attained The conclusion of all spiritual 
sciences and of all great sages is that agitation or 
transmigratory existence is the summation of all 
possible relations between subject and object , while 
liberation or tranquillity is the cessation of such 
summations In the restncted state of the mind the 


veil, namely, the objective complex, disappears and 
then, like the sun with the disappearance of the clouds. 

the supreme truth of tranquilhty shines forth vividly 
Though this ultimate truth has been indicated m 
manifold ways by various philosophers, there is no 
doubt about its umty A real difference cannot 
result from difference of labels or processes of thought 
What has been estabhshed thus far is that high souled 
sages attain that unsurpassed tranquillity which is 
untainted by association with a variety of names and 
forms They do so by attaining the stage of the 
restricted mmd after, through disciplme, discardmg 
the distractions of the mmd and sense organs and 
body Now rises the question what the state of the 
sages IS when the body, senses and the mind function 
Is theirs a plight of wretchedness full of agitation, 
such as that of the ignorant ? Never In the midst 
of agitation they experience, without a break, internal 
tranquilhty Since the principle of tranquilhty always 
shmes forth in their minds, never is tranquillity hidden 
from them How can there be darkness in light ’ 
jHow can there be agitations m tranquilhty "> Don’t 
ask, how bhss can dwell in pain When a man stands 
waist deep in the cool water of a deep pond m summer 
when all around it is scorching heat, simultaneously 
half his body feels the heat while the other half coolness 
Seetha dwelling under the asoka tree in Lanka, sur- 
rounded by ogresses, is said to have, at once, experi- 
enced the torments of hell and consequent upon her 
constant recollection of her lord, the qmntessence of 
bhss Even so, the sages also may find unavoidable 
I the activities of the sense organs and the mmd, impelled 
by past actions as well as the consequent sensations 
of pain and pleasure Even m the midst of such deep 
distraction the great souls who have firmly realized 
the essence of tranquillity vnll continue to expenence 
It Without a moment’s break for, such tranqmlhty 
shmes m their mmd When we say the supreme truth 
jmamfests itself or tranqmlhty is expenenced we mean 
Jthe same thing. Famous is the utterance of the 
teacher (Sankara) q- lassie fharil’ 

which means “ Not for half a moment do the sages 
remain without the experience of Brahman ” 

In other words, their mmd takes on the form of 
Brahman which leaves them not even for the briefest 



midst of external activities the mmd, no doubt, assumes 
from moment to moment, the forms of objects Never- 
theless, what IS extremely difficult for an ordinary 
type of knower is achieved by eminent sages, namely, 
to keep unaffected the mental grasp of the truth of 
Brahman Just as the body-bound souls never miss 
the experience of the body even in the midst of the 
uttermost distractions, so the shining forth of Brahman 
IS experienced without any difficulty by the knowers 
of Brahman who delight in Brahman and who are 
non-different from Brahman The fact is, it is easier 
llfor them to do so. It becomes their very nature 
For such sages who are hardly less than God Hunself, 
and who habitually find themselves on (he summit 
of such expenence, there is concentration of mind 
both when the mind is restricted and when it operates 
towards objects.
 Though, thus, both the states of 
concentration and distraction are alike to them, it is 
assumed, from the point of view of duality, that in 
one state, there is the apprehension of objects while, 
in the other, there is none of it. Let us, however, 
leave it at that and come back to our mam theme 
It is not surprising if other sadhus wonder at 
or even envy my good fortune m sojourning at Gomu- 
kha every year, enjoying the super mundane pleasure 
arising out of the beauty of the snow and through it 
the absolute bliss, originating in the beauty of the 
soul 
302
No fear however great, no sorrow however 
mighty, can upset the everlasting peace of one who 
has realized Brahman. Those who have seen God 
see Him everywhere and at all times. The seer is 
himself God. Then why should he fear himself 7 
How could he be affected by sorrow ? There is 
nothing strange if we, whose minds were continuously 
occupied with the thought of God and who saw, 
beyond all doubt, that all movable and immovable 
beings are but so many forms of God, were not frigh- 
tened by the objects that terrify the ignorant who 
identify themselves with their bodies. In short, we 
were not distracted by the terrors and anxieties which 
haunt the minds of common people whose love of 
the body and considerations of personal safety set 
their imagination feverishly busy.
At no time did we 
, experience there anything but cheerfulness. There 
[may be people who wonder how we were able to 
preserve fearlessness and cheerfulness in the midst 
of terrors. To them there is this brief reply ; Only a 
bird that flies through the air, knows the nature of 
I iflight ; similarly, only a sanyasin who travels in the 
world can know nothing about the secrets of the 
inner world. Among wisemen there is a well-known 
saying, “ Only the knower knows the knower 

There may still be persons who ask, “ what is 
the meaning of saying that those who have obtained 
the vision of God see him always and everywhere ? 
What is God’s shape ? What is the form of His 
vision ? ” It is impossible to answer such questions 
at onee with words. How can one describe the true 
form of God in words and make others understand 
It ? Even those who have actually seen It fail to 
describe It completely. Descriptions, however de- 
tailed or extensive, cannot hope to touch all Its aspects. 
The way to know It, is by actual experience and there 
is no other way. The srtiifs and learned men have 
described it in a thousand ways— as the Omniscient, 
the Omnipotent, the Supreme Limit of A/swarya, 
the Creator-preserver-destroyer, the shoreless, honey- 
like, Ocean of Sweetness, the Light that renders 
billions of suns dark by comparison, the Inner Being 
that controls all beings movable and immovable, the 
Embodiment of Truth-Knowledge-Bliss, the One All- 
pervading like space. One without sound, touch or 
form — so on and so forth. Indeed, we may admit 
that all these descriptions are descriptions of the 
Supreme Soul and to some extent help to convey the 
notion of what It is, but all these fall far short of 
giving men a complete idea ; for It is far above all 
description. We cannot circumscribe It with words. 
Like a fruit that floats on the surface of water, the 
Paramalma rises above tlie floods of eloquence. 
Howsoever high the water rises, the fruit still floats 
lover it. Similarly, the supreme soul keeps on rising 
'above the swelling words ; It is never submerged. 
The vision of an indescribable thing 
must necessarily be indescribable. What is the instru- 
ment with which one may perceive the Supreme Soul 
With our eye we perceive pots, etc With the mind 
we perceive desn-e, anger, etc But with neither, 
shall we perceive It which is beyond name and form. 
IHhe ancient rishis who had reahzed Truth descnbe 
l|lt as beyond words and mind Like God, the vision 
of God too is beyond words When the mmd assumes 
the form of a pot, it becomes the perception of the
pot. Like that, when the mind, rising above name 
and form, assumes the state of Brahman it is called 
the perception of Brahman, by the Vedantins. But 
Brahman has no form, ft is formless. Who can 
perceive the formless Brahman ? How can the limited 
mind comprehend the formless and u nlimi ted Brah- 
man ? It may be argued that when the mind is free 
from all its functions of imagination, it intuits Brahman, 
pure, one without a second, which shines forth in its 
own splendour without a veil ; then it is futile to 
maintain that there is a perceiver and a perception of 
Brahman. It will then follow that the intuition of 
Brahman has nothing in common with phenomenal 
.perceptions of the objective world, that, in fact, the 
perception of Brahman is the Ijasic experience of the 
non-objective. Such ate the conclusions of Vedanta. 
Even as God is. His perception also is surpassingly 
marvellous and transcendent. Hence it is impossible 
to grasp either from mere descriptions thereof. On 
ithe other hand, both of them have to be immediately 
intuited. That is the upshot of this context. 
 it would be difficult, if 
not impossible, to practise Nis/ikaiiia Karma or carry 
on Dhyana or Samadhi in a strict, scientific way. 
As is well-known, the repetition of holy names is the 
easiest step in a life of devotion. Any worldling, 
any sinner, can cry out “ O Siva ! 0 Krishna 1 ! ” 
For people engaged in the relentless pursuit of worldly 
pleasures it is -verily impossible to shed all desires or 
set their minds on God or even make them meditative. 
So, in this Age, pursuit of Bhakti h the easiest as well 
as the most important means to reach the goal. There 
can be no difference of opinion on this point. In the 
early stages, repetition of holy names and prayer, the 
singing of hymns and listening to religious discourses 
help the love of God to sprout up and as it grows 
and flourishes, the uncontrollable craving for sensual 
pleasures is tamed, and men gradually become intros- 
pective. Their minds begin to flow continuously 
towards the Lord, and experience pleasure in doing so. 
If the jmnis find their joy in meditating upon formless 
Brahman, the Bliaktas revel in the contemplation of the 
Divine form. Of course there-are not two gods, one 
with form and another without it. God is one and 
so a Bliakla who loves the Divine form intensely to 
the exclusion of everything else, has nothing more to 
gain. Let no one be under the illusion that the direct 
perception of Parabrahma who has no form and 
no attributes, alone leads to salvation, that the Bliakla 
■ has not attained it, that he is yet to achieve it and that 
until he does so, the purpose of his life remains un- 
fulfilled. If God has such a form without attributes — 
a form whose perception alone will lead to salvation — 
will not He disclose it to His true devotee one 
day or other and lead him on to the supreme goal ? 
If he is a bhakla let 
him concentrate his mind upon the form of the Lord ; 
if he is a jnani let him try to acquire steadfast knowledge 
of the formless, through earnest study and discipline. 
The supreme, the ultimate, goal of Bbakti and Jmna 
is the same. There is no doubt it is Nirvana through 
, the realization of Brahman. Certainly, those people 
who move slowly, step by step, towards the goal 
uttering the holy names of God in full faith, are 
immensely more fortunate than the unqualified persons 
who tumble down headlong into perdition during 
their attempts to scale the difficult and dangerous 
heights of Bralmia-Jnam. The path of Bhafcti is the 
royal toad to the presence of God. It is open to all 
types of people, whether learned or ignorant. It is 
also the easiest to follow. That is why the great seers 
of God, both inside and outside the Vedic pale, have 
recommended it whole-heartedly as the noblest route 
to the great goal, popularised it among the people 
tortured by the threefold sufferings of life. If there 
is God, there is no doubt. He must be omniscient, 
as well as omnipotent. He can assume any form in 
which his devotee worships Him and bless him, granting 
him a vision in that particular form. There is nothing 
illogical or unscientific in the idea. Nor is it contrary 
to experience.
To abandon all love of worldly 
pleasures and immerse one’s -mind completely in the 
love of God, can be the consummation only of great 
punya.
Whatever be the form of God, only a mind 
which has freed itself totally from worldly entangle- 
ments, can be filled with Divine love. For people 
whose vasanas (inborn dispositions) have been washed 
away by the flood of Divine love, the atmitic knowledge 
cannot be far, if at all they want it. Beh'eve firmly 
in the existence of God — believe that He is — believe 
that He is the Father of the Universe who preserves 
everything— then, it does not matter in what form you 
' worship Him, on what pedestal, or in what world you 
place Him ; then, there is no doubt, the Omniscient 
I ,One, immanent in everything and everywhere, will 
I [bestow His grace upon you. When a Bhakla, filled 
with the longing to see his Beloved, cries out as if his 
heart would break, “ My Lord, My Lord, OParcmwtma, 
when shall I behold Thy lovely form with these eyes 
of mine 7 ” only people who have tasted the Divine 
sweetness of that intense love, can understand it. 
Seeing that Bliakii and Jiwna are equally good, wise 
ones should never waste their precious time arguing 
,, excitedly about the superiority of the one or the other, 
llwhat vdse men. ought to do is to adopt one of these 
I'aaccording to their qualifications and inclinations, 
[pursue it steadily, see God and thus fulfil the purpose 
of this invaluable human birth. 
Those who possess such love of God, love such 
solitary places as Gomukha, whichever proclaim the 
glory of the Lord. Parted from her lover, his beloved 
sits in the corner of her lonely chamber where every- 
thing reminds her of him, thinking of him in secret. 
To her even the sound of a single foot-step seems 
intolerable. She hates every distraction which disturbs 
the contemplation of her lord. Even so, the bhakla 
hates all interruptions to his prayers, and all distrac- 
tions which break up his continuous contemplation of 
God whom he loves most intensely. For such bhaktas, 
can there be a place more congenial than the solitary, 
peaceful Gomukha? There is nothing here which 
docs not help the enjoyment of contemplation and 
prayer. What is here to hinder it ? This solitary 
place is. extremely suitable to people who see God, 
who love God or who meditate upon God, for they 
require no external assistance in their activities, but 
a cultured mind. Solitude serves them best to perfect 
their discipline. This Gomukha region is unrivalled 
not only in its perpetual solitude but also its clear, 
pure, spiritual atmosphere and so it aids the bhakla 
as well as the jimni to reach easily the state of samadin 
which is the culmination of jnaiia, bhakti and dhyana. 
But, for the karma yogi who is trying to perform his 
duties as acts of devotion, without any desire for 
reward, this place is not suited so well. He can 
bathe here devoutly, gain God’s grace and thereby 
destroy sins and acquire mental purity. He can 
reinforce his faith in God by observing the glory of 
the Creator which manifests itself everywhere in this 
Divine land, but unlike the other three types of yogis 
he cannot afford to stay on in this region and at the, 
same time carry on his duties as a karma yogi for a 
karma yogi has to depend necessarily upon external 
objects for his activities.
The dualism of action, cause and etfect is itself 
Samsara. Freedom from it is freedom from Sanmra. 
If action is Samsara, non-action is the cessation of 
Samsara. So even the uneducated can easily perceive 
that the states of waking and dreaming which involve 
action, cause and effect, are Samsara whereas the 
state of deep slumber (sushupU) is the cessation of 
Saiimra. If a man, out of his love for action (even 
if he has no desire for the fruit thereoO does not 
long for the everlasting peace of non-action in this 
life itself, out of that love, may wish for a fresh lease 
of life after die fall of the present body. How can 
one suppose that a seeker after Truth, who knows 
that this worldly hfe of birth, disabhng old age and 
death is misery, that the escape from it is Moksha 
and that Moksha is the same as Brahnan (which is 
homogeneous at all times, immovable and eternally 
peaceful) and who having known It, sticks resolutely 
to It, or endeavours to stick to It, will find delight in 
the continuance of the duahstic view and the tension 
of conflicting action resulting from it, while fearing 
the eternal peace of non-action ’ If what he prefers 
is Karma, which consists in the activities of the mind 
and the senses, can he really long for Moksha which 
means the cessation of all action ? Is it not more 
probable that he would prefer entering new bodies 
for further action ? If he does not desire for a state 
unfettered by the body, why should he undertake the 
Herculean labours requited for the acquisition of 
the Knowledge of Truth, for the destrucUon of inborn 
tendencies and the annihilation of Karma ’> That 
means, a region of non-action like Gomukha, though 
a source of terror to people of action, becomes a dear 
refuge to lovers of supreme peace, whose vasanas 
have been uprooted and whose minds have attained 
quiescence, even like Brahman Itself If some who 
had attained the state of Brahman (that_state_oLnon- 
action) had yet laboured m the cause of umversal 
happiness, itisnotfor any one to approve or disapprove 
of it Who can overcome one’s own nature ? What 
I mean is only this even a jnam will have to experience 
pleasures and pains according to the measure of his 
^engagement inaction , the expenence of such pleasures 
and pams is itself Samsara , and that the state of 
supreme peace, the state of Moksha, is altogether 
untouched by Samsara 
The knowledge of 
Brahman is the immediate perception of non-difference 
between Brahman on the one hand and oneself and 
the universe on the other. An uninterrupted revelling 
in this non-dual Brahman realized as the quintessence 
,of the world is the supreme goal of life. What has 
been attempted in this book is to present in an easily 
,;jintelligible manner, the truth of the identity between 
. ijiva and Brahman. This timeless truth, viz,, the 
non-duality (of reality) has been set forth here along 
witli the means and the auxiliaries that promote the 
e-xperience of this truth. 
He concedes, also, that for certain 
people the very thought of the soul is impossible 
until they have totally abandoned all distracting 
activities That is all true But, m spite of all this, 
the writer of this book does not believe that house- 
holders and other Asramilcs are disqualified to lead a 
spiritual life or that, for people m other Asrams it is 
impossible to meditate upon the Soul I have expressed 
this opinion elsewhere, but I am repeating it here to 
stress that view over again In the midst of action, 
think of the Soul Surrounded by wife, children and 
grandchildren, still think of the Paramanm with 
devout lose Think, constantly, of the power that 
activates your hands, legs, etc Always use them to 
Ido things good and desirable Allow not yourself 
to be tempted by the intoxicating wine On the 
contrary, drink, drink your fill of the Nectar of Life 
for ever more and find everlasting BLISS ' 

Om Santi ' Santi ' ' Santi ' ' 

No comments:

Post a Comment